Arizona has 15 counties in Practice Pioneer's public county dataset. This page summarizes that data — household income, population growth, dentist density, and unmet dental-care demand — with county tables for the standout values.
Population growth, dentist density, and unmet dental-care demand are national percentiles computed across the counties nationwide that have a value for that measure: a county at the 90th percentile ranks at or above 90 percent of those ranked counties. Counties without a value are excluded from a ranking. Percentiles describe counties, not individual sites.
These 10 Arizona counties rank lowest in Arizona on the national dentist-density percentile. Ties are ordered by higher population-growth percentile, then by name.
| County | Setting | Median household income | Population growth | Dentist density | Unmet dental-care demand |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenlee County | Non-metro | $75,239 | 26th | 5th | 100th |
| Yuma County | Metro | $60,417 | 91st | 36th | 59th |
| Santa Cruz County | Non-metro | $53,614 | 87th | 37th | 48th |
| Pinal County | Metro | $77,588 | 99th | 45th | 36th |
| Mohave County | Metro | $55,799 | 87th | 48th | 42nd |
| La Paz County | Non-metro | $49,506 | 68th | 54th | 100th |
| Navajo County | Non-metro | $52,752 | 69th | 60th | 40th |
| Cochise County | Metro | $58,970 | 43rd | 63rd | 100th |
| Apache County | Non-metro | $40,338 | 22nd | 72nd | 58th |
| Graham County | Non-metro | $67,326 | 79th | 74th | 100th |
These 10 Arizona counties have the highest unmet dental-care demand percentile, derived from the share of county residents living in HRSA Dental Health Professional Shortage Area ZIP codes. Ties are ordered by lower dentist-density percentile (counties with no density value first), then by name.
| County | Setting | Median household income | Population growth | Dentist density | Unmet dental-care demand |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenlee County | Non-metro | $75,239 | 26th | 5th | 100th |
| La Paz County | Non-metro | $49,506 | 68th | 54th | 100th |
| Cochise County | Metro | $58,970 | 43rd | 63rd | 100th |
| Graham County | Non-metro | $67,326 | 79th | 74th | 100th |
| Yuma County | Metro | $60,417 | 91st | 36th | 59th |
| Apache County | Non-metro | $40,338 | 22nd | 72nd | 58th |
| Gila County | Non-metro | $59,089 | 56th | 77th | 56th |
| Santa Cruz County | Non-metro | $53,614 | 87th | 37th | 48th |
| Coconino County | Metro | $69,748 | 40th | 86th | 47th |
| Mohave County | Metro | $55,799 | 87th | 48th | 42nd |
These 10 Arizona counties have the highest population growth percentile in the dataset. Ties are ordered by lower dentist-density percentile, then by name.
| County | Setting | Median household income | Population growth | Dentist density | Unmet dental-care demand |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pinal County | Metro | $77,588 | 99th | 45th | 36th |
| Yuma County | Metro | $60,417 | 91st | 36th | 59th |
| Yavapai County | Metro | $66,106 | 89th | 80th | 37th |
| Santa Cruz County | Non-metro | $53,614 | 87th | 37th | 48th |
| Mohave County | Metro | $55,799 | 87th | 48th | 42nd |
| Maricopa County | Metro | $85,518 | 84th | 89th | 34th |
| Graham County | Non-metro | $67,326 | 79th | 74th | 100th |
| Pima County | Metro | $67,929 | 75th | 79th | 37th |
| Navajo County | Non-metro | $52,752 | 69th | 60th | 40th |
| La Paz County | Non-metro | $49,506 | 68th | 54th | 100th |
The dataset has no county population field, so small counties can appear in either table; check county size before reading much into a percentile.
The county dataset was compiled September 30, 2026 (vintage acs20235-pep2024-rucc2023-hpsa2026Q3-nppes202608). This page was generated September 30, 2026 directly from that dataset. Every figure is read from the named public datasets or is a count, minimum, maximum, or sort over them; no composite score or ranking formula is applied on this page. Tables are sorted on the named measure, with ties ordered by the stated secondary ordering and then county name. County equivalents — such as Alaska boroughs and census areas, Louisiana parishes, independent cities, and Connecticut planning regions — are counted as counties. Full layer-by-layer provenance is in the evidence and coverage ledger.
This is public context for a county, not a site recommendation. It does not measure competing offices at an address, payer mix, lease terms, or patient demand for a specific practice.
The Windows planner is a free download, and the Location Scout map preview is free to explore.
Explore Practice Pioneer