Practice Pioneer · Market data by state

Opening a dental practice in Michigan: the numbers

Michigan has 83 counties in Practice Pioneer's public county dataset. This page summarizes that data — household income, population growth, dentist density, and unmet dental-care demand — with county tables for the standout values.

Michigan at a glance

83counties in the dataset (30 metro, 53 non-metro)
$47,777 to $101,315range of county median household income (Iosco County to Livingston County)
11counties at or above the 75th percentile for population growth
9counties at or below the 25th percentile for dentist density
33counties at or above the 75th percentile for unmet dental-care demand

Population growth, dentist density, and unmet dental-care demand are national percentiles computed across the counties nationwide that have a value for that measure: a county at the 90th percentile ranks at or above 90 percent of those ranked counties. Counties without a value are excluded from a ranking. Percentiles describe counties, not individual sites.

Counties with the lowest dentist-density percentile

These 10 Michigan counties rank lowest in Michigan on the national dentist-density percentile. Ties are ordered by higher population-growth percentile, then by name.

Michigan counties by lowest dentist-density percentile
County Setting Median household income Population growth Dentist density Unmet dental-care demand
Osceola County Non-metro $57,050 69th 5th 100th
Alcona County Non-metro $53,568 80th 6th 100th
Gladwin County Non-metro $55,576 68th 11th 53rd
Oscoda County Non-metro $50,581 81st 17th 100th
Alger County Non-metro $59,406 22nd 19th 49th
Presque Isle County Non-metro $56,713 60th 21st 100th
Keweenaw County Non-metro $53,893 84th 22nd 100th
Arenac County Non-metro $56,989 47th 22nd 100th
Van Buren County Non-metro $66,902 49th 24th 48th
Montmorency County Non-metro $47,803 91st 27th 100th

Counties with the highest unmet dental-care demand percentile

These 10 Michigan counties have the highest unmet dental-care demand percentile, derived from the share of county residents living in HRSA Dental Health Professional Shortage Area ZIP codes. Ties are ordered by lower dentist-density percentile (counties with no density value first), then by name. HRSA often designates whole counties, so 33 Michigan counties share the state's highest value; the table shows the first 10 of them in that order. 4 Michigan counties share the dataset's lowest value for this measure and are not listed.

Michigan counties by unmet dental-care demand percentile
County Setting Median household income Population growth Dentist density Unmet dental-care demand
Osceola County Non-metro $57,050 69th 5th 100th
Alcona County Non-metro $53,568 80th 6th 100th
Oscoda County Non-metro $50,581 81st 17th 100th
Presque Isle County Non-metro $56,713 60th 21st 100th
Arenac County Non-metro $56,989 47th 22nd 100th
Keweenaw County Non-metro $53,893 84th 22nd 100th
Montmorency County Non-metro $47,803 91st 27th 100th
Clare County Non-metro $49,805 61st 28th 100th
Menominee County Non-metro $55,688 21st 32nd 100th
Missaukee County Non-metro $61,868 54th 39th 100th

Counties with the highest population growth percentile

These 10 Michigan counties have the highest population growth percentile in the dataset. Ties are ordered by lower dentist-density percentile, then by name.

Michigan counties by population growth percentile
County Setting Median household income Population growth Dentist density Unmet dental-care demand
Lake County Non-metro $49,680 92nd 85th 100th
Montmorency County Non-metro $47,803 91st 27th 100th
Keweenaw County Non-metro $53,893 84th 22nd 100th
Crawford County Non-metro $58,614 83rd 75th 100th
Antrim County Non-metro $71,421 82nd 56th 25th
Oscoda County Non-metro $50,581 81st 17th 100th
Alcona County Non-metro $53,568 80th 6th 100th
Montcalm County Metro $64,892 79th 40th 50th
Kalkaska County Metro $60,365 78th 66th 40th
Mecosta County Non-metro $57,774 77th 63rd 100th

The dataset has no county population field, so small counties can appear in either table; check county size before reading much into a percentile.

Sources and method

The county dataset was compiled September 30, 2026 (vintage acs20235-pep2024-rucc2023-hpsa2026Q3-nppes202608). This page was generated September 30, 2026 directly from that dataset. Every figure is read from the named public datasets or is a count, minimum, maximum, or sort over them; no composite score or ranking formula is applied on this page. Tables are sorted on the named measure, with ties ordered by the stated secondary ordering and then county name. County equivalents — such as Alaska boroughs and census areas, Louisiana parishes, independent cities, and Connecticut planning regions — are counted as counties. Full layer-by-layer provenance is in the evidence and coverage ledger.

This is public context for a county, not a site recommendation. It does not measure competing offices at an address, payer mix, lease terms, or patient demand for a specific practice.

Related

Plan a practice in Michigan

The Windows planner is a free download, and the Location Scout map preview is free to explore.

Explore Practice Pioneer