Oklahoma has 77 counties in Practice Pioneer's public county dataset. This page summarizes that data — household income, population growth, dentist density, and unmet dental-care demand — with county tables for the standout values.
Population growth, dentist density, and unmet dental-care demand are national percentiles computed across the counties nationwide that have a value for that measure: a county at the 90th percentile ranks at or above 90 percent of those ranked counties. Counties without a value are excluded from a ranking. Percentiles describe counties, not individual sites.
These 10 Oklahoma counties rank lowest in Oklahoma on the national dentist-density percentile. Ties are ordered by higher population-growth percentile, then by name. No density value could be computed for 2 of 77 counties, so those are left out of this ordering.
| County | Setting | Median household income | Population growth | Dentist density | Unmet dental-care demand |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cotton County | Metro | $60,313 | 33rd | 0th | 100th |
| Tillman County | Non-metro | $47,445 | 12th | 3rd | 100th |
| Love County | Non-metro | $62,940 | 70th | 4th | 40th |
| Okfuskee County | Non-metro | $45,441 | 51st | 4th | 100th |
| Roger Mills County | Non-metro | $62,721 | 8th | 4th | 100th |
| Nowata County | Non-metro | $52,679 | 68th | 5th | 44th |
| Marshall County | Non-metro | $56,495 | 85th | 9th | 100th |
| Grant County | Non-metro | $61,824 | 25th | 10th | 33rd |
| Hughes County | Non-metro | $47,923 | 43rd | 11th | 100th |
| Beaver County | Non-metro | $64,266 | 40th | 12th | 100th |
No dentists could be allocated to these counties in the source data, so they have no density value: Cimarron County, Jefferson County.
These 10 Oklahoma counties have the highest unmet dental-care demand percentile, derived from the share of county residents living in HRSA Dental Health Professional Shortage Area ZIP codes. Ties are ordered by lower dentist-density percentile (counties with no density value first), then by name. HRSA often designates whole counties, so 33 Oklahoma counties share the state's highest value; the table shows the first 10 of them in that order. 1 Oklahoma county shares the dataset's lowest value for this measure and is not listed.
| County | Setting | Median household income | Population growth | Dentist density | Unmet dental-care demand |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cimarron County | Non-metro | $57,204 | 2nd | — | 100th |
| Jefferson County | Non-metro | $48,750 | 50th | — | 100th |
| Cotton County | Metro | $60,313 | 33rd | 0th | 100th |
| Tillman County | Non-metro | $47,445 | 12th | 3rd | 100th |
| Okfuskee County | Non-metro | $45,441 | 51st | 4th | 100th |
| Roger Mills County | Non-metro | $62,721 | 8th | 4th | 100th |
| Marshall County | Non-metro | $56,495 | 85th | 9th | 100th |
| Hughes County | Non-metro | $47,923 | 43rd | 11th | 100th |
| Beaver County | Non-metro | $64,266 | 40th | 12th | 100th |
| Ottawa County | Non-metro | $48,656 | 48th | 14th | 100th |
These 10 Oklahoma counties have the highest population growth percentile in the dataset. Ties are ordered by lower dentist-density percentile, then by name.
| County | Setting | Median household income | Population growth | Dentist density | Unmet dental-care demand |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canadian County | Metro | $85,427 | 99th | 65th | 22nd |
| McClain County | Metro | $84,778 | 99th | 75th | 27th |
| Wagoner County | Metro | $78,520 | 97th | 25th | 33rd |
| Bryan County | Non-metro | $54,280 | 94th | 44th | 57th |
| Logan County | Metro | $82,735 | 94th | 48th | 22nd |
| Grady County | Metro | $75,730 | 89th | 55th | 32nd |
| Rogers County | Metro | $77,688 | 89th | 77th | 34th |
| Marshall County | Non-metro | $56,495 | 85th | 9th | 100th |
| Lincoln County | Metro | $59,425 | 81st | 52nd | 42nd |
| Kingfisher County | Non-metro | $70,617 | 80th | 73rd | 23rd |
The dataset has no county population field, so small counties can appear in either table; check county size before reading much into a percentile. A dash in the dentist-density column means no dentists could be allocated to that county in the source data (2 of 77 counties here).
The county dataset was compiled September 30, 2026 (vintage acs20235-pep2024-rucc2023-hpsa2026Q3-nppes202608). This page was generated September 30, 2026 directly from that dataset. Every figure is read from the named public datasets or is a count, minimum, maximum, or sort over them; no composite score or ranking formula is applied on this page. Tables are sorted on the named measure, with ties ordered by the stated secondary ordering and then county name. County equivalents — such as Alaska boroughs and census areas, Louisiana parishes, independent cities, and Connecticut planning regions — are counted as counties. Full layer-by-layer provenance is in the evidence and coverage ledger.
This is public context for a county, not a site recommendation. It does not measure competing offices at an address, payer mix, lease terms, or patient demand for a specific practice.
The Windows planner is a free download, and the Location Scout map preview is free to explore.
Explore Practice Pioneer