Wisconsin has 72 counties in Practice Pioneer's public county dataset. This page summarizes that data — household income, population growth, dentist density, and unmet dental-care demand — with county tables for the standout values.
Population growth, dentist density, and unmet dental-care demand are national percentiles computed across the counties nationwide that have a value for that measure: a county at the 90th percentile ranks at or above 90 percent of those ranked counties. Counties without a value are excluded from a ranking. Percentiles describe counties, not individual sites.
These 10 Wisconsin counties rank lowest in Wisconsin on the national dentist-density percentile. Ties are ordered by higher population-growth percentile, then by name.
| County | Setting | Median household income | Population growth | Dentist density | Unmet dental-care demand |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florence County | Non-metro | $62,786 | 67th | 1st | 26th |
| Trempealeau County | Non-metro | $71,295 | 40th | 19th | 17th |
| Marquette County | Non-metro | $63,471 | 53rd | 20th | 42nd |
| Waupaca County | Non-metro | $71,189 | 26th | 23rd | 32nd |
| Washburn County | Non-metro | $61,270 | 64th | 26th | 53rd |
| Kewaunee County | Metro | $80,085 | 52nd | 27th | 13th |
| Clark County | Non-metro | $66,250 | 47th | 30th | 40th |
| Vernon County | Metro | $69,556 | 64th | 31st | 49th |
| Pierce County | Metro | $88,802 | 71st | 33rd | 13th |
| Juneau County | Non-metro | $65,150 | 32nd | 36th | 46th |
These 10 Wisconsin counties have the highest unmet dental-care demand percentile, derived from the share of county residents living in HRSA Dental Health Professional Shortage Area ZIP codes. Ties are ordered by lower dentist-density percentile (counties with no density value first), then by name. 16 Wisconsin counties share the dataset's lowest value for this measure and are not listed.
| County | Setting | Median household income | Population growth | Dentist density | Unmet dental-care demand |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crawford County | Non-metro | $63,496 | 35th | 47th | 100th |
| Ashland County | Non-metro | $57,645 | 54th | 49th | 58th |
| Sawyer County | Non-metro | $59,055 | 78th | 73rd | 58th |
| Price County | Non-metro | $58,720 | 45th | 75th | 56th |
| Grant County | Non-metro | $64,349 | 49th | 39th | 55th |
| Monroe County | Non-metro | $68,213 | 43rd | 63rd | 54th |
| Washburn County | Non-metro | $61,270 | 64th | 26th | 53rd |
| Richland County | Non-metro | $62,649 | 30th | 56th | 51st |
| Vernon County | Metro | $69,556 | 64th | 31st | 49th |
| Fond du Lac County | Metro | $73,154 | 42nd | 67th | 49th |
These 10 Wisconsin counties have the highest population growth percentile in the dataset. Ties are ordered by lower dentist-density percentile, then by name.
| County | Setting | Median household income | Population growth | Dentist density | Unmet dental-care demand |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dane County | Metro | $88,108 | 82nd | 81st | 13th |
| St. Croix County | Metro | $102,482 | 81st | 66th | 13th |
| Lafayette County | Non-metro | $72,091 | 80th | 42nd | 44th |
| Sawyer County | Non-metro | $59,055 | 78th | 73rd | 58th |
| Forest County | Non-metro | $59,727 | 77th | 61st | 42nd |
| Burnett County | Non-metro | $61,664 | 77th | 63rd | 46th |
| Bayfield County | Non-metro | $69,609 | 77th | 68th | 32nd |
| Vilas County | Non-metro | $67,132 | 77th | 85th | 13th |
| Adams County | Non-metro | $59,153 | 74th | 39th | 42nd |
| Pepin County | Non-metro | $74,536 | 72nd | 54th | 13th |
The dataset has no county population field, so small counties can appear in either table; check county size before reading much into a percentile.
The county dataset was compiled September 30, 2026 (vintage acs20235-pep2024-rucc2023-hpsa2026Q3-nppes202608). This page was generated September 30, 2026 directly from that dataset. Every figure is read from the named public datasets or is a count, minimum, maximum, or sort over them; no composite score or ranking formula is applied on this page. Tables are sorted on the named measure, with ties ordered by the stated secondary ordering and then county name. County equivalents — such as Alaska boroughs and census areas, Louisiana parishes, independent cities, and Connecticut planning regions — are counted as counties. Full layer-by-layer provenance is in the evidence and coverage ledger.
This is public context for a county, not a site recommendation. It does not measure competing offices at an address, payer mix, lease terms, or patient demand for a specific practice.
The Windows planner is a free download, and the Location Scout map preview is free to explore.
Explore Practice Pioneer